Momelotinib Sustains Long-Term Survival in Patients With Myelofibrosis

Article

Treatment with momelotinib improved overall survival and sustained efficacy outcomes in patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis.

Treatment with momelotinib improved overall survival (OS) and sustained efficacy outcomes in patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis, according to updated findings from the phase 3 SIMPLIFY-1 and SIMPLIFY-2 trials that were presented at the 62nd American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting.1,2

Lead author Srdan Verstovsek, MD, PhD, said momelotinib conveyed a treatment benefit in both patients who had previously received treatment with ruxolitinib (Jakafi) and those who had not received a JAK inhibitor.

“In both the JAK inhibitor-naïve and previously ruxolitinib-treated patients, with an overall survival of more than 34.3 months and 37.5 months observed in the 2 treatment arms of SIMPLIFY-2 to compare very favorably with overall survival previously reported in patients who discontinued JAK inhibitor therapy and received salvage therapy,” said Verstovsek, chief of the section for myeloproliferative neoplasms in the Department of Leukemia at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

This analysis includes findings from a total of 558 patients treated in the SIMPLIFY-1 (NCT01969838) and SIMPLIFY-2 (NCT02101268) trials comparing momelotinib versus ruxolitinib (Jakafi) or best available therapy (BAT). Patients in the trials entered a 24-week randomization treatment phase, followed by an opportunity for extended momelotinib treatment for all patients. Patients in SIMPLIFY-1 were naïve to ruxolitinib while patients in the second trial had received prior treatment. Splenic response rate was the primary endpoint in both studies.

In SIMPLIFY-2, the median OS was 34.3 months for patients originally assigned to momelotinib and 37.5 months (HR = .96; P = .86) for those assigned to ruxolitinib/BAT who subsequently crossed over to the experimental drug. Verstovsek called that the best OS reported for patients previously treated with ruxolitinib.

The median OS was 37.5 months for those who crossed over to receive momelotinib.

In SIMPLIFY-1, the median OS was not reached for patients initially treated with momelotinib compared with 53.1 months in patients who crossed over from the ruxolitinib arm (HR = .99; P = .97). Forty percent of patients who received momelotinib had a splenic response at any time. Median duration of splenic response was not reached whether patients were initially assigned to momelotinib or crossed over at 24 weeks.

Verstovsek said momelotinib produced robust transfusion independence (TI) in both studies. In SIMPLIFY-1, TI response at week 24 was 67% in the experimental arm compared with 49% in the control arm (P <.001). Furthermore, the median duration of TI has not been reached after more than 3 years of follow up. In SIMPLIFY-2, TI response at week 24 was 43% in the MMB arm and 21% in the control arm (P = .001).

In safety results from SIMPLIFY-2 published in 2018, the most common grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were anemia (14% on momelotinib vs 14% on BAT), thrombocytopenia (7% vs 6%, respectively), and abdominal pain (1% vs 6%). Moreover, peripheral neuropathy occurred in 11% of those on momelotinib, one of which was grade 3, and in no patients on BAT.3

Thirty-five percent of patients in the momelotinib arm experienced serious AEs compared with 23% in the BAT arm. Six patients in the experimental arm experienced AEs leading to death—acute myeloid leukemia (n = 2), respiratory failure (n = 2), cardiac arrest (n = 1), and bacterial sepsis (n = 1). There were 4 such deaths in the BAT arm: sepsis (n = 2), lung adenocarcinoma (n = 1), and myelofibrosis (n = 1).

Myelofibrosis results from dysregulated JAK-STAT signaling and is characterized by constitutional symptoms, splenomegaly, and progressive anemia. Momelotinib is a selective and orally bioavailable inhibitor of JAK1, JAK2, and ACVR1.

Drug maker Sierra Oncology is continuing its investigation of momelotinib in the global, randomized, double-blind phase 3 MOMENTUM clinical trial (NCT04173494). An estimated 180 patients with myelofibrosis who are symptomatic, anemic, and have been previously treated with a JAK inhibitor will be randomly assigned to momelotinib or danazol (Danocrine). Following 24 weeks of therapy, patients on the danazol arm will be permitted to cross over to the momelotinib arm.

The primary endpoint is total symptom score (TSS) response rate of momelotinib compared with danazol at week 24. Sierra Oncology expects to present top-line data in the first half of 2022.

References

1. Verstovsek S, Egyed M, Lech-Maranda E, Sacha T, et al. Robust overall survival and sustained efficacy outcomes during long term exposure to momelotinib in jak inhibitor naïve and previously JAK inhibitor treated intermediate/high risk myelofibrosis patients. Presented at: the 62nd ASH Annual Meeting. December 5, 2020. https://bit.ly/3ggaOXA.

2. Sierra Oncology presents long-term overall survival and sustained efficacy outcomes data for momelotinib at ASH Annual Meeting. News release. December 5, 2020. bit.ly/2JUteRn

3. Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Platzbecker U, et al. Momelotinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (SIMPLIFY 2): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5(2):e73-e81. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30237-5.

Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Performance status, age, and comorbidities may impact benefit seen with immunotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Related Content