(S020) Availability of Single-Fraction Palliative Radiotherapy for Cancer Patients Receiving End-of-Life Care Within the Veterans Healthcare Administration

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 28
Issue 4_Suppl_1

Single-fraction palliative radiotherapy for bone metastasis appears to be much more available for cancer patients receiving end-of-life care within the United Veterans Healthcare Administration when compared with the general US health care system.

Drew Moghanaki, MD, MPH, Alice Cheuk, MD, Helen Fosmire, MD, Mitchell Anscher, MD, Michael Hagan, MD, PhD, Stephe Lutz, MD, George Dawson, MD; United States Department of Veterans Affairs

Background: Recent surveys have demonstrated that < 20% of US-based radiation oncologists are willing to offer single-fraction palliative radiotherapy for bone metastasis. The United Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) initiated this study to determine the willingness of radiation oncologists who work within the VHA to offer single-fraction treatment.

Methods: In early 2013, a 12-question survey was emailed to all 78 radiation oncologists currently practicing at VHA radiation oncology facilities. Phone calls were made to nonresponders. Radiation oncologists who did not offer single-fraction palliative radiotherapy were evaluated by Fisher’s exact test for associations with a variety of factors.

Results: The response rate was 90% (70/78). Half were full-time employees of the VHA, and the majority had thoroughly read either the American College of Radiology (ACR) or American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) guidelines for palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases. Single-fraction palliative radiotherapy for bone metastasis is currently offered by 75.7% of respondents. Those not offering single-fraction palliative radiotherapy (24.3%) were more likely to be > 10 years out of training (37% vs 10%; P = .01) and more likely to have worked in private practice at some point in their career (36% vs 12%; P = .03). There were no associations with employment status, history of an academic appointment, or whether they had read the ACR or ASTRO guidelines.

Conclusion: Single-fraction palliative radiotherapy for bone metastasis appears to be much more available for cancer patients receiving end-of-life care within the VHA when compared with the general US health care system.

Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Metastases
(S001) Limb-Sparing Surgery and Intraoperative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Primary, Nonmetastatic Extremity and Limb-Girdle Soft Tissue Sarcoma
(S003) Disparities in Stage at Diagnosis and Survival in Adult Cancer Patients According to Insurance Status
(S004) Radiation Publications Underrepresented in High-Impact General Medical and Oncology Journals 
(S005) Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Stage II Endometrial Carcinoma: Is Brachytherapy Alone Sufficient for Local Control?
(S006) Extended-Field IMRT With Concomitant Boost for Node-Positive Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Regional Control Rate and Recurrence Pattern
(S007) Stereotactic Radiosurgery to the Brain With Concurrent BRAF Inhibitors for Melanoma Metastases
(S008) Use of Mobile Devices for Creation of Survivorship Care Plans
(S009) Two-Year Outcomes Following Triapine Radiochemotherapy for Cervical Cancer 
(S010) Prospective and Real-Time Data Analysis of Image-Guided Radiotherapy Across a Multinational Pediatrics Consortium: Methodology and Considerations 
(S011) Comparison of Toxicities and Outcomes for Conventional and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Early Glottic Carcinoma
(S013) Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide for Anaplastic Gliomas: The Twelve-Year Washington University Experience
(S014) Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Brainstem Metastases
(S015) Temporal Lobe Radionecrosis After Skull Base Radiotherapy: Dose-Volume Predictors 
(S012) Prognostic Value of Radiographic Extracapsular Extension in Locally Advanced Non-Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers
Recent Videos
Preliminary phase 2 trial data show durvalumab plus lenalidomide was superior to durvalumab alone in refractory/advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Performance status, age, and comorbidities may impact benefit seen with immunotherapy vs chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Developing odronextamab combinations following CAR T-cell therapy failure may help elicit responses in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Related Content