Satya Das, MD, MSCI, on the Design of a Study of PRRT in Patients With Well-Differentiated NETs

Video

The expert in hematology/oncology spoke about the study which evaluated the use of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

Of patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD-NETs) who were treated with 3 to 4 doses of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), those with a lower clinical score experienced better progression-free survival (PFS) with treatment when compared against those with a higher clinical score, according to results from a study presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium.

Of note, this difference in PFS was not observed in patients who did not receive PRRT, indicating there is a predictive utility of clinical score for patients with WD-NETs receiving PRRT with lutetium Lu 177 dotatate (Lutathera).

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Satya Das, MD, MSCI, assistant professor of Medicine in the department of Medicine of the division of Hematology/Oncology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, discussed the design of the study.

Transcription:

There’s a lot of uncertainty as to when patients with well-differentiated NETs should get Lutathera or treatment with [peptide receptor radionuclide therapy; PRRT]. The focus of our study was to actually assess and look for answers. It was a cohort analysis that we did. And we looked at 146 patients, 122 at Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center and 24 from Rush Medical Center. We had a total of 146 patients included in this cohort.

Reference:

Das S, Du L, Schad A, et al. A clinical score (CS) for patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD NETs) under consideration for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with Lu 177-dotatate. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 3). Abstract: 363.

Recent Videos
Cytokine release syndrome was primarily low or intermediate in severity, with no grade 5 instances reported among those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Safety results from a phase 2 trial show that most toxicities with durvalumab treatment were manageable and low or intermediate in severity.
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Using bispecific antibodies before or after CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma is an area of education for community oncologists.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
Optimal cancer survivorship care may entail collaboration between a treating oncologist and a cancer survivorship expert.
Related Content