Tamoxifen Prophylaxis Is Cost-Effective, Should Be Covered by Insurance

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 14 No 4
Volume 14
Issue 4

According to the first cost-effectiveness analysis of tamoxifen (Nolvadex), high-risk women who use tamoxifen to prevent breast cancer should be reimbursed by medical insurance in the same way as other preventive drugs and procedures are

According to the first cost-effectiveness analysis of tamoxifen (Nolvadex), high-risk women who use tamoxifen to prevent breast cancer should be reimbursed by medical insurance in the same way as other preventive drugs and procedures are reimbursed. Currently, some patients who are not enrolled in clinical trials must pay the annual $1,000+ expense themselves.

The analysis found that tamoxifen “is one of the most cost-effective medical interventions known,” according to Thomas Smith, MD, of Massey Cancer Center at Virginia Commonwealth University, lead author of the study. “Compared to most forms of medical treatment, it makes sense for insurers and society to fund.”

Both Smith and Bruce Hillner, MD, also of the Massey Cancer Center, estimate that tamoxifen will prevent 1,665 cancers for every 100 women who take the drug for 5 years, as was reported by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. If a death from breast cancer is fully prevented by this drug, then the cost-effectiveness of tamoxifen compared to no intervention is $8,479 per additional year of life gained. In other words, to save one year of life for an individual woman would cost society $8,479. According to Smith, the cost of the drug, as well as the costs of both side effects and additional procedures, must all be balanced against the effectiveness of tamoxifen.

Costs Are Well Below the Standard Benchmark

At $8,479 per additional year of life gained, the sum is well below the $50,000 that is now a standard benchmark for whether or not a drug is cost effective. Smith says that “using tamoxifen is more cost-effective than the use of either mammography for detecting early breast cancer or hypertension drugs for preventing strokes and heart attacks—each of which cost about $20,000 per year of life gained. And those drugs are clearly seen as a societal good.”

Recent Videos
Updated results from the 1b/2 ELEVATE study elucidate synergizing effects observed with elacestrant plus targeted therapies in ER+/HER2– breast cancer.
Patients with ESR1+, ER+/HER2– breast cancer resistant to chemotherapy may benefit from combination therapy with elacestrant.
Heather Zinkin, MD, states that reflexology improved pain from chemotherapy-induced neuropathy in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer.
Study findings reveal that patients with breast cancer reported overall improvement in their experience when receiving reflexology plus radiotherapy.
Patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer were offered 15-minute nurse-led reflexology sessions to increase energy and reduce stress and pain.
Whole or accelerated partial breast ultra-hypofractionated radiation in older patients with early breast cancer may reduce recurrence with low toxicity.
Ultra-hypofractionated radiation in those 65 years or older with early breast cancer yielded no ipsilateral recurrence after a 10-month follow-up.
The unclear role of hypofractionated radiation in older patients with early breast cancer in prior trials incentivized research for this group.