Uday R. Popat, MD, Reviews Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide Vs Tacrolimus and Methotrexate to Prevent GVHD in AML/MDS

Video

Uday R. Popat, MD, spoke about how well post-transplant cyclophosphamide vs tacrolimus plus methotrexate to prevent graft-vs-host disease was performed in this trial.

Uday R. Popat, MD, professor and deputy chair ad interim in the Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, Division of Cancer Medicine, at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, spoke to CancerNetwork® during the 2022 Tandem Meeting about the results observed with post-transplant cyclophosphamide use vs tacrolimus plus methotrexate to prevent graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome who underwent a matched donor hematopoietic cell transplantation after myeloablative busulfan. The treatment utilized in the trial (NCT02250937) helped to reduce severe GVHD and nonrelapse mortality.

Transcript:

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide, as expected, reduced severe GVHD after a myeloablative regimen. The acute severe GVHD rate was 17% in the tacrolimus plus methotrexate arm and it went down to 4% [with cyclophosphamide], almost a 4-fold reduction. This then translated into a 4-fold reduction in treatment-related or nonrelapse mortality. Mortality in the tacrolimus-plus-methotrexate [arm] was 24% and it was reduced to 6%. This then translated into better survival. That was 85% vs 41% at 1 year and 69% vs 38% at 3 years. These were impressive results.

Reference

Popat UR, Mehta Rs, Bassett R, et al. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus tacrolimus and methotrexate to prevent graft-versus-host-disease in recipients of matched donor transplantation: comparison of sequential cohorts in a prospective trial. Presented at the 2022 Tandem Meeting; Salt Lake City, Utah; April 23-26, 2022. Poster 379.

Recent Videos
Greater direct access to academic oncologists may help address challenges associated with a lack of CAR T education in the community setting.
Certain bridging therapies and abundant steroid use may complicate the T-cell collection process during CAR T therapy.
Educating community practices on CAR T referral and sequencing treatment strategies may help increase CAR T utilization.
A retrospective study sought to assess CRS and ICANS onset and duration, as well as non-relapse mortality causes in patients infused with CAR T-cell therapies.
A retrospective study sought to assess CRS and ICANS onset and duration, as well as non-relapse mortality causes in patients infused with CAR T-cell therapies.
A retrospective study sought to assess CRS and ICANS onset and duration, as well as non-relapse mortality causes in patients infused with CAR T-cell therapies.
Future meetings may address how immunotherapy, bispecific agents, and CAR T-cell therapies can further impact the AML treatment paradigm.
Treatment with revumenib appeared to demonstrate efficacy among patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia in the phase 2 AUGMENT-101 study.
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Data from the REVEAL study affirm elevated white blood cell counts and higher variant allele frequency as risk factors for progression in polycythemia vera.
Related Content