Latest News

Phase 3 CROWN trial findings suggest that patients with ALK-positive NSCLC may maintain efficacy even after reducing lorlatinib dosing to mitigate AEs.
Elucidating Lorlatinib Benefit, ALK TKI Sequencing in ALK-Positive NSCLC

April 14th 2025

Phase 3 CROWN trial findings suggest that patients with ALK-positive NSCLC may maintain efficacy even after reducing lorlatinib dosing to mitigate AEs.

Surufatinib/Toripalimab Shows Encouraging Activity in NSCLC and SCLC
Surufatinib/Toripalimab Shows Encouraging Activity in NSCLC and SCLC

April 8th 2025

A futility analysis showed that ociperlimab was unlikely to reach the primary end point of overall survival as part of the phase 3 AdvanTIG-302 trial.
Developers Terminate Clinical Program for Ociperlimab in Lung Cancer

April 3rd 2025

AI, Immunotherapy, More Key Lung Cancer Advances Highlighted at 2025 ELCC
AI, Immunotherapy, More Key Lung Cancer Advances Highlighted at 2025 ELCC

April 1st 2025

A stronger commitment to tobacco control at the local, state, and federal levels may further improve progress in preventing smoking-related mortality.
Tobacco Control Helps Avert Millions of Lung Cancer Deaths

March 27th 2025

More News


Site Logo

First-Line Treatment for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

November 1st 2005

With best supportive care alone, patients with metastatic non–smallcelllung cancer (NSCLC) have a median survival of 4 to 5 months anda 1-year survival rate of approximately 10%. Trials carried out in the1980s and 1990s comparing chemotherapy to best supportive care reportedvariable efficacy results; however, a pivotal meta-analysis of thesedata indicated that cisplatin-based chemotherapy provided a survivalbenefit in advanced NSCLC. In the past decade newer agents such asgemcitabine (Gemzar), vinorelbine, paclitaxel, and docetaxel (Taxotere)have all demonstrated activity in NSCLC as single agents; consequentlythese agents have been combined with cisplatin or carboplatin. Randomizedphase III trials comparing these “newer” platin-based doubletshave failed to identify an optimal platinum-based doublet therapyregimen. Though it is clear that chemotherapy is an appropriate treatmentfor many patients with lung cancer, there a sense in which the useof traditional chemotherapeutic agents has reached a therapeutic plateau.Increased understanding of cancer biology has revealed numerouspotential therapeutic strategies, including targeting the epidermalgrowth factor receptor, protein kinase C, rexinoid receptors, and theangiogenesis pathway. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group studyE4599 comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin with/without bevacizumab isthe first phase III randomized trial to show a survival advantage withthe addition of a molecularly targeted agent to chemotherapy in thechemotherapy-naive patient population. Future studies will involve theevaluation of additional targeted agents plus chemotherapy as well aslooking at combinations of these targeted agents alone or with chemotherapy.


Site Logo

Radiofrequency Ablation in Lung Cancer: Promising Results in Safety and Efficacy

October 1st 2005

Only about 15% of patients diagnosed with lung carcinoma eachyear are surgical candidates, either due to advanced disease orcomorbidities. The past decade has seen the emergence of minimallyinvasive therapies using thermal energy sources: radiofrequency,cryoablation, focused ultrasound, laser, and microwave; radiofrequencyablation (RFA) is the best developed of these. Radiofrequency ablationis safe and technically highly successful in terms of initial ablation.Long-term local control or complete necrosis rates drop considerablywhen tumors are larger than 3 cm, although repeat ablations can beperformed. Patients with lung metastases tend to fare better with RFlung ablation than those with primary lung carcinoma in terms of localcontrol, but it is unclear if this is related to smaller tumor size at time oftreatment, lesion size uniformity, and sphericity with lung metastases,or to differences in patterns of pathologic spread of disease. The effectsof RFA on quality of life, particularly dyspnea and pain, as well aslong-term outcome studies are generally lacking. Even so, the resultsregarding RF lung ablation are comparable to other therapies currentlyavailable, particularly for the conventionally unresectable or high-risklung cancer population. With refinements in technology, patient selection,clinical applications, and methods of follow-up, RFA will continueto flourish as a potentially viable stand-alone or complementarytherapy for both primary and secondary lung malignancies in standardand high-risk populations.