Insights from CARTITUDE-4 and KarMMa-3 in R/R MM
Experts on multiple myeloma provide their impressions of the CARTITUDE-4 and KarMMa-3 studies, which led to the approval of cilta-cel and ide-cel in earlier lines of treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory disease.
Video content above is prompted by the following questions:
- Briefly review the CARTITUDE-4 trial that led to cilta-cel’s approval in earlier lines of treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM).
- Please comment on the patient population – intention-to-treat vs patients treated.
- What was the rationale for the difference? How does it affect your interpretation of the data?
- How did the safety outcomes compare with other CARTITUDE trials?
- Please share your real-world experience.
- Please review data from KarMMa-3, which led to ide-cel’s approval in earlier lines of therapy for R/R MM.
- What are thoughts on the efficacy and safety outcomes?
- Please share your real-world experience.
- How do these approvals impact the current and future treatment landscape of R/R MM?
- How might you choose one over the other?
- How does it address an unmet need?
Recent Videos
Related Content
The Hidden Danger Unveiling the Connection Between Multiple Myeloma and Pleural Effusion
FNU Fatima, MBBS;Faryal Arif, MBBS;Muhammad Hamza Gul, MBBS, MD;Neha Siddiqui, MBBS;Muhammad Zulqarnain, MBBS;Abdul Baseer Wardak, MBBS
November 8th 2024Article
This case highlights the importance of early recognition and management of pleural effusion in patients with multiple myeloma and underscores the need for further research into optimal management strategies and underlying mechanisms.
